Europe is faced with a number of challenges that require careful planning, further collaboration and a united response, plus a decisive foreign policy. Christos Mouzeviris is looking at the immigration issue and asking if a new wave of immigration is the best solution for Europe’s ageing population.

For the past few years the Brexit result and a number of Central and Eastern European countries refusing to take refugees have caused cracks in the EU and contributed to our continent’s immigration problem and refugee crisis.

And although most of the new arrivals in Europe come from war torn countries like Syria, others are coming from Africa and South Asia in search for a better life. European states have long debated, argued and often disagreed on how to deal with the issue. Technically, the best way to limit the flow while finding a solution, would to reach the root of the problem. There is huge inequality in our world, with some nations enjoying a high standard of living while others having the majority of their population living in poverty, denied an education, working opportunities and other basic human needs.

Will it ever end?

It is naive to imagine that the people from the poor regions of this world will ever stop trying to reach wealthier countries in hope for a better life. Besides, as Europe and almost every developed region of this planet is faced with a fertility rate decline and an ageing population, immigration could provide a solution to this predicament. Yet it also poses its own challenges. How do you assimilate people with often a totally different culture than yours, or how you stop the rise of xenophobia and the various Far-Right movements that have been established all over Europe in response to high immigration?

In addition to the economic inequality, there is also another imbalance in our planet. The poorer or developing regions experience a population boom that if not dealt with soon enough, could make matters worse. Overpopulation in some regions across the world is putting extreme pressure on local governments to find resources to accommodate all these people. And as poorer families are usually the ones who have more children, it is evident that there is a link between overpopulation, poverty and lack of education.

A global growth issue

Demographic growth presents a global challenge: In 13 years time (2030), the world population is projected to grow more than one billion people, reaching 8.6 billion people in total. It is predicted to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100. In other words, 83 million people is being added to the world’s population every year.

Nowadays, the problem is not only overpopulation, but also the abnormal disparity in its distribution. On the one hand, great challenges of overpopulation are presented to poor and emerging countries while, on the other hand, the European Union, Japan and the United States will need to revise migration policies and implement new changes in their economic models if they want to guarantee pensions and social security contributions in the coming years. It is the very economic model that Europe has adopted post WWII, that contributed to the financial recovery and an economic boom, but also to smaller families and a constant decline of its population fertility rates. Better education, the equal integration of women in the workforce, consumerism, higher living standards that alter our expectations and goals in life and the extension of our life expectancy all contribute the phenomenon of an ageing and declining population.

Yet in the past, Europe had a similar mentality and culture of bigger families, just as many of the developing countries have nowadays. It needed people to colonise the rest of the world, or sustain its industrial and economic revolution. Just as our continent switched its priorities and policies, so can other regions.

Thus perhaps the solution to Europe’s immigration problem does not lie in sending boats to stop the flux of migrants, or raising walls across the entry points. Maybe we should try helping others reaching our living standards, thus tackling global wealth inequality. If the poorer regions close the gap, then their societies will also follow the developed nations’ economic or social model. Combine this with better education, then their youths will have all they need to start a better future in their home countries, rather than risking their lives to enter illegally in Europe.

It is proven that immigrants arriving in Europe adapt in its society and adopt local family models after one generation. Their birth rates fall to similar levels to those of European families. So if they can achieve this in our continent, why can’t they do it in their own countries, if they achieve similar living standards? Another one of Europe’s societal changes that can be promoted to tackle overpopulation is the decriminalisation of homosexuality and the promotion of marriage equality in other regions of the planet. If same sex couples are not seen as a taboo and are widely accepted, then they can contribute to the population reduction in the developing world, together with the promotion of smaller families and more educated populace.

The Danish model

While some of the Western “heavyweights” like the USA and Britain chose isolationism and conservatism, some of the smallest European nations are realising that to tackle the problem, we need to engage with the poor nations and help them. Denmark, a small European country generally recognised for its social democratic values and strong welfare state, has like other European countries seen immigration become a central political issue. Anti-immigrant and asylum-seeker sentiment has grown across the political spectrum, just as the number of asylum seekers has spiked in the tiny country. The far-right, nativist Danish People’s Party has grown rapidly in recent years, becoming the second-largest political party during the 2015 elections. The number of asylum seekers increased from 14,792 in 2014 to 21,316 in 2015 according to statistics from the Danish Ministry of Immigration, Integration and Housing, out of a total population of 5.7 million. Speaking at a family planning summit in London last month, Danish Minister for Development Cooperation Ulla Tørnæs justified a 91-million kroner ($15 million) commitment to underwriting contraceptives in Africa.

“To limit the migration pressure on Europe, a part of the solution is to reduce the very high population growth in many African countries,” she stated. Tørnæs additionally noted that curtailing African population growth is important for Danish foreign and security policy.(Foreign Policy)

That perhaps is a much better solution, than rescuing capsized boats full of desperate, drowning people and the EU as a whole needs to participate and follow Denmark’s example – Educate the poorer countries about overpopulation and its impact on the environment, or their societies and their natural resources. If they don’t, we are going to be faced with ever increasing pressure for migration to richer and less populated countries, with potentially the cause of either conflict, or starvation in poor nations.

Our continent is one of the regions that will feel the pressure to accept more immigrants as we are currently facing from Africa and the Middle East. We must sort out our policies on immigration and our demographics. Time is running out and we need to act soon.

Christos Mouzeviris
Christos Mouzeviris is a Greek journalist and photographer based in Dublin. Christos is a pro-European federalist.

    Treaty with Bulgaria – first step of Macedonia’s rocky road to EU and NATO

    Previous article

    National Federation of Cypriots in the UK press release

    Next article

    You may also like


    1. Interesting ideas but premature I suspect. Until negotiations on the terms of the position of EU in UK and UK throughout the EU people is resolved we can only speculate. However, the contradictions are already emerging. Where racist incidents occur media are concentrating on what is happening to EU people in the UK, but the majority of attacks whether simply verbal or actual violence are as much or measurably more against non-EU people and, indeed, UK citizens who may be third or fourth generation who do not have Anglosaxon origins. So colour as well as language/accent predestine targeting victims. Then we hear that attempts to make a new trade agreement with India have a demand for an increased immigration quota! That is not just walking into the devil’s den but opening the door for him.
      There is an aging population thank the UK asking people to have more children after WW2, although my parents only had two of us, then bringing in commonwealth immigration. The labour force was depleted by war casualties and the number of military personnel stationed in occupied countries and attempting to keep control of colonies that wanted independence so were using violent means to achieve it. Now we have a situation where a lot of us are still alive but are now accused of some kind of moral crime of being alive and too many, taking too much pension money (among the worst pensions in Europe incidentally) but somehow because we dared to age being complicit in not enough workers. Yet the real figures of unemployment if they were not concealed behind ZHCs, placements, disqualification from receiving benefits and so on would suggest a fairly sizeable number of ‘real’ unemployed people who are not being deployed in workplaces. Simply importing labour, especially non-white, will exacerbate and already inflamed situation that will not add to the UK’s attempts at making themselves appear positive despite Brexit. Since I cannot and will not believe that those pulling the strings do not know the consequences of immigrant labour into an already increasingly xenophobic country, then I can only assume they do not care. The UK is inward looking, therefore world demographics and the Danish model will not interest them.
      So why am I concentrating on the UK here? Well, Brexit is putting them in a very accessible position where we can see good illustrations of what is happening. I live in France where xenophobia toward particular people and one religious group especially is growing. I have spent many years in Germany, xenophobia goes up and down there but recently the country’s generous treatment of refugees has gone from public sympathy to growing hatred. Depending on where one goes in Spain, it is increasing, so too Italy and no doubt other countries I am not as familiar with. So I am suggesting that UK watching is very useful for us to learn from and anticipate exactly how the situation of immigrants might be in the near future. For myself, I tend to suspect that across Europe, including the UK, that the xenophobic attitudes toward other Europeans will calm down and be largely forgotten. The focus of racism will turn to non-Europeans far more. Bringing immigrants into Europe to boost labour forces, especially where people of the countries doing so see their own large numbers of unemployed, will be a gift in the laps of the extreme right wing who despite the 2016/17 turn around will be resurgent. We should fear that and force our politicians to think before acting and making our nations into hateful politically oppressive states.

    2. I can sound racist to someone but No, immigration is not the best solution for the ageing population in Europe. It is stupid to believe that this could be an option. There is nothing wrong with the emigration but you cannot expect that immigrants will save your Europe – they are here to stay and to change the face of Europe. At the end nothing will be the same

    Leave a reply